Editorial team and review process
Last updated: 9 September 2026
VeriNourish is written and checked by an editorial team rather than by a single named expert. We think you deserve to know exactly what that means before you act on anything you read here, so this page describes the process, the people behind it, and the point where our review stops being useful to you.
Who produces the content
Guides are produced by the VeriNourish editorial team, which is credited on every article as VeriNourish Editorial Team. We do not publish guest bylines, ghost-written sponsored posts, or articles attributed to experts who did not write them. When a guide says the editorial team wrote and checked it, that is literally what happened.
You will not find a photograph and a list of degrees at the top of these articles. That is deliberate. A credential we cannot show you a public record for is not evidence of anything, and we would rather point you at the studies than at a biography.
What our review actually checks
Every guide goes through the same checks before it publishes and again whenever it is updated:
- Each health claim is traced back to a named source, and the source is read rather than cited from a summary.
- Study population, design, outcome measured and stated limitations are checked against what the guide says the study shows.
- Doses, nutrient amounts and lab thresholds are matched to the source figure. Numbers are not rounded or adjusted for readability.
- Guideline versions and publication dates are checked so we are not quoting advice that has been superseded.
- Every reference link is opened and confirmed to resolve to the document we are citing.
- Established recommendations are separated from preliminary or conflicting findings, and where the evidence is weak the guide says so.
- Safety guidance stays in: when to see a doctor, red-flag symptoms, and testing before supplementing.
What that review does not cover
- It is not a clinical review. No licensed clinician approves this content.
- It is not a diagnosis, a treatment plan, or advice about your individual case.
- It cannot account for your medications, conditions, pregnancy status or lab history.
- It does not make an unsettled area of research settled. Where the science disagrees, we report the disagreement.
What you can check yourself
The honest test of a health site is whether you can audit it. Ours currently publishes 73 guides carrying 346 named sources from 138 distinct publishers and institutions, with the earliest guide dated 2026. Every one of those sources is listed at the foot of its guide with a working link, so you can open the underlying study or guideline and judge whether we read it correctly.
We favour systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised trials and current clinical guidance, including sources such as the NHS, NICE, the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, the World Health Organization and peer-reviewed literature indexed in PubMed Central.
Subject areas we cover
When we get something wrong
We will. When you find it, tell us and we will fix the guide and record what changed. See our corrections policy, or get in touch directly.
Related policies
- Editorial policy, covering evidence standards and updates.
- Editorial and evidence review policy.
- How we choose products, and our affiliate disclosure.
- Conflict of interest.